Home
|
|
|
The American sailors were bobbing about in
the sea.
They were watching the sharks and awaiting rescue. The
officers among
them (those that were left) knew that the hoped for deliverance
from the
sharks and the sea would be long coming. Their ship,
the U.S.S. Indianapolis,
had been sunk by the Japanese sub I-57. By an Irony within
an irony,
if I-57 had sunk the Indianapolis on it's out-bound sourty, the
sub would
have changed history, if not the war.
The Indianapolis was returning from Tinian Island, where it had dropped off several crates. The crates carried the parts of the Atomic bombs thought to valuable to send by any other means of transport. The mission of the Indianapolis was so secret that it would take days before anyone even knew the ship (steaming under radio silence) was missing and more days before the remaining sailors were rescued. The loss of the Indanapolis is considered one of the worst tragidies in United States Navy history. But the cruiser did make it to Tinian and the "Enola Gay" did fly, and days later, "Bock's Car" carried out it's mission. And these two missions are the only times Atomic weapons have ever been used in warfare. The first mission was a 100% success. The second mission barely made it at all. The Japanese Generals accepted the atomic bomb and even after the Russians entered the war, the Japanese leaders were prepared to fight on. The nation was to be destroyed, rather then captured. Death before dishonor. But something happened. Something unthinkable. In his afterword to the his book The Kamikazes, Hoyt sums it up as well as I've ever seen it put down on paper: "... In spite of the general belief to the contrary, it was not the atomic bomb that stopped the war. The generals and admirals of the war party had said they could and would accommodate themselves to the bomb.How much did the Atomic bombs affect the outcome? There can be no doubt that they did have influence on the Emperor. How much more did the entry of the Russians into the war? Some people have speculated this was of more concern. If the Atomic bombs did hasten the end of the war, was it worth the lives lost? My cousin, who was in the Philippines, preparing for the invasion of Japan at the time, told me he was "Damn happy that they dropped the bomb. I wanted to get the thing over with and get home." But in the distuction of Japan as a society it is interesting to remember that less then 3% of the total damage was due to the atomic bombs. Between 200,000 and 300,000 people lost their lives to the fire bombings (83,000 in Tokyo on the first night) while only 86,000 lost their lives at Hiroshima and 23,000 lost their lives in Nagasaki. We tend to look at the destruction of the Bombs in relationship to the small force used to deliver them. When we remember that conventional bombing ruined the lives of 22 MILLION Japanese; when we compare the damage done with conventional bombs to the damage done with the atomic bombs we see that there was really very little difference. In many cases, more damage (if not direct loss of life) was done by conventional bombing. When looked at in the context of time and place, the atomic bombs were just one more weapon used to try to end a war that should have been over years before. There could be no better Epilogue the the words of Hoito Edoin, in his book The Night Tokyo Burned : "... One further irony remains. Once the war was ended, and the shock and horror of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki raids began to permeate the consciousness of the people of the world, all sorts of help came to the survivors of the atomic bombs. The Japanese government made provisions for the assistance as well. But as for the survivors, ten times as many, of the firebombings of Japan, there was no help of any international attention. There was noting romantic about the devastation of their lives. The just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time when General LeMay's B-29s came along." The books I used in this series were: A Torch To the Enemy, c1960, Martin Caidin Airwar vol 4 - wings of fire, c1971, Edward Jablonski B-29 Superfortress in action, c1977, Steve Birdsall Enola Gay , c1977, Gordon Thomas and Max Morgan Witts. Fortress without a Roof, the Allied bombing of the Third reich, c1982, Wiobur H. Morrison. Superfortress, c1988, Gen. Curtis E. LeMay (Ret) and Bill Yenne Superfortress - The Boeing B-29, c1980, Steve Birdsall The Battle for Guadalcanal, c196, Gen. Samuel B. Griffith II (Ret.) The Gathering Storm, c1948, Winston Churchill The Kamikaze, c1983, Edwin P. Hoyt The Pacific War 1931-1945, c1968, Saburo Ienaga The Pacific War 1941-1945, c1981, John Costello The Night Tokyo Burned, c1987, Hoito Edoin World War II In The Air - The Pacific, c1963/1963, Edited by Col James F. Sunderman and many more... |
Return to military
Return to home